criticism of the Labour Party - a party that is currently trying to hurl blame onto the Coalition for the current spending cuts, despite Labour being responsible for putting us into ridiculous levels of debt in the first place. Randall points to the incredible hypocrisy of Labour who, having spent and spent and spent the country into near oblivion, now turn around and criticise the spending cuts as "harsh" and moan about how it is going to affect the poor, and limit services etc.
Now apart from the fact that the cuts cannot significantly hurt the poor and drag us down into a Dickensian nightmare, because we will still be spending hundreds and hundreds and billions of pounds (well over a trillion dollars for my American friends) on services and welfare etc, it is also a bit rich for Labour to moan about it, even if that was the case. Why?
Well, as Randall's article shows, public spending grew by a stunning 50% in real terms under the Labout government! This rise in spending is Obama-like in both its scale and its destructiveness. It left us wide open to get nailed by a recession, and sure enough that is exactly what happened in 2008. They can try and blame "the bankers" all they want, but the fact still remains that Britain was ridiculously unhealthy economically when the recession hit, which then only made things much worse.
As I have said in my previous post, I do not fully agree with the distribution of the spending cuts, but there is no argument that spending cuts were absolutely 100% necessary. Britain could still double-dip, it could still go bankrupt. Britain is not out of this crisis yet, and yet Labour still argue that the Coalition is doing too much!! It really is quite incredible. They have destroyed business, wrecked the economy, seen our unemployment rate soar and made Britain the sick man of Europe once again - and yet they still don't seem to acknowledge that there is a problem, or that they are the primary figures responsible.
Well, Mr Miliband and Mr Johnson, if government spending is so damn good, and your government was such a great bloody success, would you care to inform me why, after a 50% rise in public spending in real terms, that we even have any poor people? With all that spending on "poverty" and welfare, shouldn't we have abolished poverty? Shouldn't we all be living in some sort of healthcare/housing/public services paradise? Wasn't that the whole reason for all these stupid programmes and schemes that drove us into economic suicide in the first place?!
Of course, we are not living in a welfare paradise, because government spending wrecks economies and lives, it does not fix them. That is exactly what Britain has discovered in the last 13 years of a Labour government, and it is now time to make it right. However, it needs the current Coalition to put forward the case for low tax, low spending, small government, or the chance will be wasted, and Labour will capitalise on this ridiculous situation.