Sunday, 5 December 2010
His latest article is on the ridiculous START treaty, which seeks to limit the number of nuclear weapons that both the US and Russia possess - the idea being that this will make the world safer as not only does it mean there are less nukes, but that it might also encourage Iran and North Korea to stop playing with nuclear weapons too. These two arguments are nonsensical, and it one wouldn't be surprised if Mr Obama came out and say "You can't hug your children with nuclear arms!"
As Krauthammer points out, it isn't necessarily the symbolism of START which is problematic, but instead more worrying is Obama's ultimate aim that there are no nuclear weapons in existence. This is completely idiotic for two reasons.
The first is that even if this dream were able to be achieved, this would leave us at an enormous disadvantage against Russia. The reason the Soviets were so in favour of nuclear disarmament in the 70's and 80's wasn't because they were all peace loving hippy types, but because nuclear weapons were the only area that the United States could beat the Soviets with. When it came to military numbers, tanks, planes etc, the Russians were well ahead of the game, due to their industrial capabilities and their enormous population which meant they had manpower for both industry and for the army. If the Cold War had been fought only on the ground,
Second of all, there is no such thing as a nuclear free world, and if Russia and America abolished their nukes, it would mean that the whole world could be held hostage by the one country that did manage to sneak out a weapon. Why Obama believes that America not having weapons would do anything but encourage rogue nations to gather nukes is beyond me! Without America having nukes, it would only remove the deterrent that currently stops smaller nations developing nukes themselves.
START also brings the revisionist history of the Cold War that the left have tried to tell into focus. The fact is that we won the Cold War by having greater numbers of more powerful nukes and better defences than the Soviets did. Reagan's plan (that the left hated) worked, and yet we are told that it didn't and that somehow the CND movement that pervaded the 80's were right, when they were in fact wrong. Until now this has not mattered a great deal, but now we have a President in the White House who buys into this nonsense, and this should worry us.
It is up to the Republicans to put a spanner in the works of this treaty in 2011, or the world will be a less safe place as a result. To fall back on the obvious pun - it is time to put a stop to START.